For many people online, the word “spillover” is music to their ears. It basically means results from no work at all. We all want to get spillovers when we join a forced matrix program and usually it’s the “promise” of spillovers that draws us to join. Unfortunately, most people’s hopes and dreams are dashed when, after waiting a month or more, they don’t see any spillover effects and leave the program feeling like they were falsely duped into joining via an empty promise.
I am now 6 months into my ongoing research on online programs. As a result, I’ve learned a few things that should help everyone at least get the MAXIMUM spinoff possible.
The first thing I want to point out is that spillover effects on ANY program will be minimal. If you get 1 surplus per month from your upline/sponsor then you should be very happy. If any sponsor ever promises you an “AMAZING” spillover, ask them to back that promise with some kind of guarantee. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but don’t believe anyone, it might just be hype and a simple marketing ploy (which is of course very short-sighted on the sponsor’s part).
When I consider a forced matrix program, the first thing I look at is the structure of the matrix. For example, Teamwork Revolution and Revolutionary Matrix are 5×6 matrixes, while Work for 3 Dollars is 3×15. If you don’t know what that means, the first number represents the width of the array and the second number is the depth. It’s the first number that should interest you most when looking for an array with high overflow.
A 5×6 matrix means your sponsor (or the person above you) can only have 5 people directly below them. After you have recruited or sponsored 5 people, successive recruits will “pour over” one of those 5 who have already been recruited. So if you are your sponsor’s first recruit, then your sponsor’s sixth recruit would spill under you and give you a downline member and in turn some sort of commission or income without any backline work. your part. A 5×6 matrix essentially means you get 20% of the efforts of your direct upline member (this may or may not be the person who sponsored/recruited you). 20% of all success your direct upline member spills under you. Wonderful right? However, with Work for 3 Dollars that increases to 33% because that array is thinner at 3 wide. Therefore, mathematically speaking, the overflow will be greater with Work for $3 than with Teamwork Revolution or other matrix programs. However, this is not always the case. Let me explain why.
First of all, it is almost impossible to be on the front lines of a good sponsor. If you come across a “heavy hitter” (meaning someone who is very skilled at online marketing and does a lot of advertising), you will NOT end up on their front row. These “heavy fish” have been in the game for a while and probably already have a very large downline. So if you decide to join this heavy hitter’s team, probably because you want to follow in his footsteps and learn from them, you’ll fall under one of the members already on his team. This is where the “lottery factor” comes into play. What if you spill under someone who is lazy? Someone who is just sitting and waiting for it to spill? Remember that you only get 20% (in a 5×6 matrix) of the efforts of the person directly above you, not 20% (in a 5×6 matrix) of the person who invited you to the show. 20% of zero is zero. So when considering joining a program, ask the “heavy” who on his team is a good recruiter with a good open position. This will keep you from spilling under a lazy member and the “heavy hitter” won’t mind giving you this information as you still benefit from having you in their downline regardless of where you are. Don’t randomly spill under someone. In fact, the way overflow works, it USUALLY overflows under the weakest person. Maybe I’ll explain why in a different article.
I mentioned earlier that a 3×15 matrix should have more spillovers than a 5×6 matrix. Mathematically speaking, this is true, however, what if the sponsor has more than 1 position? This is quite common in the world of online marketing, as I have discovered. Many marketers buy multiple positions under themselves to leverage their efforts and earn more money. By doing this, they slow down the overflow of their recruits. So if a heavy hitter has 2 positions in a 3×15 matrix but only 1 position in a 5×6, mathematically 1 position in a 5×6 will provide a better spinoff. But even then there are more factors to consider.
You also have to see how difficult it is to get recruits. For example, Teamwork Revolution is $10/month (as of this writing) and Work for $3 is just a one-time payment of $3 + $0.40 Alertpay fee. I joined these two programs at the same time and traded them side by side to see how each performed. During my first month, I sponsored about 5 people into Teamwork Revolution and received about the same in indirect benefits. On the other hand, Work for 3 Dollars gave me ZERO spillovers, but I was able to personally sponsor about 60 people during that same month.
This seems to defy logic. Work for $3 is an array only 3 wide, so my overflow rate should have been higher, but in fact it was ZERO (and still is after 6 months). The problem is that I spilled myself under someone who is not doing marketing or is doing it without success. With Teamwork Revolution the situation was different. I was able to secure a frontline position from a GDI marketing expert. I told her that I would only join her in Teamwork Revolution if I was on her front line. She agreed on the condition that I wouldn’t be lazy and actually market the show, which I did. It’s by being on the front lines of this marketing expert that I was able to get those spillover effects. So with Teamwork Revolution I was in the right place at the right time. This is a very important factor to obtain a good spillover effect.
Now back to my point about the “difficulty factor”. Let’s say $3 Work was 10 wide while Teamwork Revolution was only 2 wide. Mathematically, under these conditions, working for $3 is not good. The array is too wide to see decent overflow. But you need to look at my results from my first month. Since Teamwork Revolution is more expensive and also requires you to pay a monthly fee, people are less likely to join. Labor for $3 is very cheap and a one time fee. So it’s very low risk, so people don’t really think about it. They just impulsively join without thinking. So, in my hypothetical example, Work for $3 still offers a higher spin-off rate than Teamwork Revolution, despite being much broader.
In summary, there are 3 factors to consider when looking for maximum spillover. The first is the die width :5×6? 3×15? the second is Who is your DIRECT upline member? (not necessarily your sponsor). If it spills under a lazy person waiting for a spill, then you won’t see any spills for quite some time. The third factor to consider is the difficulty factor From the program. If the program is a 2×10, for example, that’s the best spin you can get. No matrix can be thinner than 2. However, if that program costs $1000 per month, how many people do you think will join?
By taking these 3 factors into account, it is possible to create a mathematical equation that will give you an “overflow score”.
Overflow = (100 / Width of matrix) x (The efforts of your direct upline member, i.e. lazy or hardworking) x (The difficulty in getting people to join the program, i.e. the program is of $1000 per month or a simple $1 one-time fee?)
My latest experiment has been with the Teamwork Revolution Power System. It’s a 2×8 matrix and has provided the bulk of EVERY program I’ve experimented with over the past 6 months. This goes hand in hand with my equation above because for one this array is only 2 wide (this is mathematically as thin as an array can get). Also, I’m under some good recruiters (i.e. no lazy people above me) and finally, this program is FREE to join right now, which makes the third factor (difficulty recruiting people) for the best too possible, since who will think twice before joining. something that is free? So with all the best possible factors in my favor, I have been able to truly experience the MAXIMUM Spillover. For example, after 6 days I had more than 30 strokes. After 1 month more than 140.
So now I know what Maximum Spillover really is. I am sure that I will never experience higher contagion rates than this again in my lifetime. The only problem with this is that no one has had to pay money yet. I have all these downline members, but I don’t have any money or income to prove it yet. The first payment is set for November, so we’ll see how many of those people actually pay and decide to continue with the program. It will be excellent research material for my online marketing experiment.